This week’s post will be a very quick introduction to something known as the bracing sequence. This is a sequence that I make a lot of use of during my classes, and is basically a series of steps that the students can follow to arrange themselves into a structured position and achieve midline stabilisation.
I should say that the bracing sequence is not my idea, it was developed by Dr. Kelly Starrett, and if you search for “bracing sequence” on Youtube you will find many videos by him and others explaining the bracing sequence. I am not going to be adding new information for those that already know about this, but I hope that HEMAists who have never heard of the bracing sequence before will begin to make use of it after reading this article.
One bit of feedback that I have heard being given quite a few times, and sometimes said myself, is that an opponent did lots of unexpected things in a fight. For example I’ve often heard one fighter say to another that the blows coming in against them were at unusual angles, and so were difficult to deal with. At first, this clearly seems like a good thing. If your attacks are unusual or different in some way, this can often make it much harder for the opponent to parry them, so you therefore should be able to hit the opponent more.
While this article will be focusing on unusual attacks, the same applies to footwork, defences or any other element of fighting. There are many unusual things a fencer could do in a fight: they might try to duck under an incoming strike rather than parry or step back, a broadsworder may use short edge attacks instead of the normal cuts 1 through 6, a longsworder may decide to switch hands mid-fight. There are many other possible examples, and to the fencers making use of them, they may seem useful and valid.
However, doing the unexpected in sparring is not always a good thing, especially for beginning or intermediate fencers. This may sound like a bizarre thing to say, as fighters are normally encouraged not to be predictable, but using unusual techniques is often more of a hindrance than a help. In this article I’ll be outlining a few reasons why this might be the case.
A photograph of a group exercise about range and distance, taken at one of the practices at RMAS in Dundee.
One of the most difficult decisions you have to make when setting up a new club is to decide how much to charge for participation in your training sessions. If you set the rate too low, then you will have difficulty paying for hall hire and meeting your financial obligations. If you set it too high, then people might not be willing to pay that much, and you will have difficulty finding and retaining members.
Nonetheless, it is my opinion (based on significant experience teaching at both an amateur and professional level) that it is better to set a higher price than a lower price.
Rather than picking a number out of thin air, it is important to consider the matter carefully, and to choose a number that works for you and your club. It is not necessarily helpful to base your choice on what other clubs in the area may charge for sessions, since they may have advantages (or disadvantages) that you do not have.